Not only is the federal government in the mortgage business with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, they have a sister, Ginnie May. All three "companies" do essentially the same thing: buy mortgages from banks (i.e., supply banks with money) and bundle the mortgages up into a security instrument that is then resold to investors. Their "value-add" is the backing, real or implied, of the US Government--read taxpayers--so that if the mortgages are not repaid, then the Government will cover the losses.
Since I cannot explain a good reason why the Government is in the mortgage business, I surely cannot explain why they created not one but three distinct entities with about 95% overlapping missions.
Ginnie Mae was split off of Fannie Mae when Fannie Mae was recharted in 1968.
About the title: http://dontcomeinhere.blogspot.com/2008/09/dont-come-in-here.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Is power needed to "implement principles"?
A "progressive" WSJ commenter stated What is the point of principles if you have no power to implement them? My response: Pri...
-
WSJ article : President-elect Obama has pledged a $1 trillion stimulus package. To put it in perspective, that sum would exceed, in inflatio...
-
On CNN this morning, some asshat was talking about how it will be good to partially nationalize banks by forcing them to sell preferred con...
-
Our good friend sent us this link (Read the Stimulus). At least two promises are being broken. Congress passed a resolution last week that...
No comments:
Post a Comment