An Obama ad running now belies logic…
“But chances are you pay a higher tax rate than him.”
“Mitt Romney made twenty million dollars in two thousand ten but paid only fourteen percent in taxes…probably less than you.”
The implication here is that the viewer of this commercial is *likely*
to pay more than 14% in federal income taxes. On some forums, I'd have
to explain the difference between "chances are" vs "there's a chance" as
well as "probably" vs "perhaps" (not to mention the difference between
"imply" vs "infer"), but I think most people understand the
distinctions.
Knowing something about the distribution of taxes, I was incredulous. So
I hopped onto the IRS website to check the most recent data (2009).
According to the IRS, the average effective tax rate paid by the lower
99% of the nearly 140 million tax returns was only 8.43%.
But funny things happen to number when you average in cumulative blocks
like that. For example, if there are ten people in a room, where nine
have $1 in their pocket and one has $100, it is accurate but
uninformative to say that the average is $10.90. So I checked the CBO
site too.
The CBO reports the data differently than the IRS, breaking down tax
returns by income quintiles (and a few sub groups). According to the
CBO, the lower four quintiles have effective income tax rates of -6.6%,
-0.8%, 3.0% and 6.0%, respectively. That is, 80% of all tax returns have
effective tax rates below 6%. According to the CBO data, you'd need to
be in the top 10% by income before your effective tax rate hits 15%.
It seems to me that the odds of a viewer of that ad paying more than
Romney's 14% is about 1 in 10 or thereabouts--hardly rising to the level
of "chances are" or “probably” when comparing Romney’s 14% effective
rate to the effective rates of the a random person watching the ad.
If you think what Romney paid was too little, argue that point. But stop making false statements.
My family's effective income tax rate last year was 21.36%. That's about
5% higher than the Obama's tax rate, and we made less than half of what
the Obama's reported. It would be wrong for me to put out an ad saying
"Chances are you paid a higher rate than Pres. Obama." even if it
happened to be true for me.
About the title: http://dontcomeinhere.blogspot.com/2008/09/dont-come-in-here.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Is power needed to "implement principles"?
A "progressive" WSJ commenter stated What is the point of principles if you have no power to implement them? My response: Pri...
-
Whenever taxation is discussed, someone inevitably will posit "What we need is a 10% flat tax on all income, no exclusions, no deductio...
-
A "progressive" WSJ commenter stated What is the point of principles if you have no power to implement them? My response: Pri...
-
Once again our good friend Bill has produced a must-read link. I have neighbor who stopped to chat while I was doing yard work and we got t...
No comments:
Post a Comment